- Joined
- Oct 13, 2012
- Posts
- 1,390
- Reaction score
- 355
First time I've been to one since voting for 'Nice peas, Norma' back in 92.
And all the while he was porking Currie
First time I've been to one since voting for 'Nice peas, Norma' back in 92.
I've shown that the fact you quoted about the elderly man was incorrect.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. You are the one with the outlandish theories - it falls to you to provide evidence. That means evidence for your claims, not tangentially related facts that don't actually support them
"Shown that the fact you quoted about the elderly man was incorrect" ... SHOWN? Shown where? What was the post number?
You'd make a good politician because you never answer a direct question.
I assume that because you haven't responded about who started the EU you've found out I was right? Tell me I'm wrong about Walter Hallstein....no wait; this time please don't just say 'you're wrong' (which you seem to think is proof) tell everyone why I'm wrong.
American, but interesting read. May answer the question:I wonder if there has ever been a case study
This was fun... quirky polling stations.
http://www.theguardian.com/politics...uirky-referendum-polling-stations-in-pictures
American, but interesting read. May answer the question:
http://liberalarts.utexas.edu/gover...onandWlezienElectoralStudies2012published.pdf
Was also first result on Google
Was also first result on Google
The sky is blue. This does not prove that the Sun is green.
If you want to claim the Sun is green, you have to provide evidence - you can't just shout at other people to prove you wrong.
(In case this isn't clear, I'll explain - the fact that Walter Hallstein was instrumental in setting up the EU does not prove that there was a secret German plot to take over the world by stealth. It would be highly surprising if there were no German academics involved in setting up the EU. Most young German men fought for Germany in the war. You cannot use a random fact to prove an unrelated hypothesis)
Enough. You're apparently not capable of rational argument.
So...you ignore that I asked you to say which post you'd supposedly proven me wrong about the hero! Typical.
You think Hallstein is a random fact?
Well here are a few thousand other facts to go with it... http://www.eu-facts.org/en/background/dark_roots_europe_lecture.html
You must be sooo sure of yourself that you didn't even bother to look for any evidence to try and disprove what I wrote. You could've found that site in seconds on Google.
Bye bye.
No no no you don't understand do you. We don't have a veto on anything, we, the people, will not have a vote. Take for instance Turkey joining, the PM has already agreed to it, why would he veto it, by the time they admit them it will all be agreed. Whichever government is in will decide how they vote and everything is a trade off. You really are naïve as to how these things work and very easily led. You have just voted our democracy away, though it will take time for you to see it. But we did have a choice and it is how it is. Anybody under 35 won't even notice the difference, they will grow into it and of course accept the gradual change and erosion of our understanding of parliamentary democracy over the next 40 years. We either wanted to keep our sovereignty and voter determination or we didn't.Despite the anti-german jibe this is a reasonably fair and honest argument, and I'm glad you realize that your position involves an economic trade-off.
We have a veto on any further integration and have already stated we are not going to be part of it. Our identity is not at risk. We retain parliamentary sovereignty, as we always have
Odds heading the other way again - flurry of bets on leave
No no no you don't understand do you. We don't have a veto on anything, we, the people, will not have a vote. Take for instance Turkey joining, the PM has already agreed to it, why would he veto it, by the time they admit them it will all be agreed. Whichever government is in will decide how they vote and everything is a trade off. You really are naïve as to how these things work and very easily led. You have just voted our democracy away, though it will take time for you to see it. But we did have a choice and it is how it is. Anybody under 35 won't even notice the difference, they will grow into it and of course accept the gradual change and erosion of our understanding of parliamentary democracy over the next 40 years. We either wanted to keep our sovereignty and voter determination or we didn't.
The greater powers do not think the future should be entirely in the hands of the electorate. You have surely seen a super state influenced by big business in this referendum. All big business and government funded experts dancing to the tune of money.
He who pays the piper calls the tune.
This is not sour grapes, and it will be so gradual it will not be noticed, it's a very gradual erosion of self determination.
Odds heading the other way again - flurry of bets on leave
I wish I knew enough about betting to know what this means...
View attachment 1230 View attachment 1231
http://www.oddschecker.com/politics...referendum/referendum-on-eu-membership-result
Good or bad?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.