I reply to the bits that seem to be fact-based yet incorrect with sources or data that debunk those facts
As for anything that smacks of a personal attack, well it has no place in this thread (even Abba can be "weaponised"). It's simply unnecessary - play the topic, not the player!
Abba was a low blow, but to be fair, you were/are ignoring everything but the money angle.
It feels a bit like trying to debate Cameron on TV. Every answer he gives is the same, "because the economy."
If you want to talk about the money angle, go for it. Let's assume that Brexit happens and the EU loses the 12% of its budget that comes from us. And let's say that no trade agreements are agreed because unlimited migration is a red line we won't cross during negotiations.
Now 12% of a relatively small €155 billion may not seem like much. But in this scenario, the other EU countries (which by now are going through their own political instability because the EU is starting to come apart at the seams) have to find more money for the EU - and to do that while managing their own GDP falls (that massive problem for the UK you're so concerned about).
Likely the Euro is coming under pressure again, because Greece are still in real financial difficulty. Germany are still refusing to offer any debt relief, and their position has hardened because now they're on hook for a big share of the share the UK used to pay, and also because their motor industry is struggling to compete in one of its major markets due to tariffs.
What now? How does the EU manage to fill its budget hole? How does Germany? What happens to Greece? And the Euro?
And that's why the idea of failing to agree trade deals is complete nonsense. The stakes are too high. The other EU countries need trade as much as we do.
Isn't changing freedom of movement rules for the UK a small price to pay?