- Joined
- Jun 14, 2004
- Posts
- 11,064
- Reaction score
- 942
I am explicitly not going to answer that. Let's not start stuff related to Brexit again here, please.
Murrays comment was about you not Brexit, i think that is clear
I am explicitly not going to answer that. Let's not start stuff related to Brexit again here, please.
Murrays comment was about you not Brexit, i think that is clear
This charade has gone on way too long for me, I've been going out for the last week. Good to see local take aways also opening round here. If they can't trust me with an exit plan, I'll form my own. In fact, I'd now encourage people to do the same. I'll still respect social distancing though. I would never intrude on someone elses beliefs.
This is a few months old, we have no idea about the antibodies/immunity over the mid to long term.
This is a few months old, we have no idea about the antibodies/immunity over the mid to long term
Are you just here to troll?
So how well does your 'exit plan' work out when everyone is doing the same as you've actively encouraged in a public forum - can you maintain social distancing in densely populated areas? Because it seems difficult to do amidst a lock down at times, let alone anywhere near normal numbers of people out and about.
FYI, I will not be responding to any of your posts from here on out. I mention that for clarity because we had been mid-way through a discussion about the Stanford study.
I refuse to engage from here on out with anyone who can be so deliberately provocative in the middle of a crisis as you've just set out. Actively encouraging others to flout the arrangements meant to protect us all? It's disgraceful, plain and simple.
In the slang of psychology, the colloquial term control freak describes a person with a personality disorder characterized by undermining other people, usually by way of controlling behaviour manifested in the ways that he or she acts to dictate the order of things in a social situation.
This article is only available to subscribers
Completely meaningless really. When you have an 'outcome' it's extremely easy to fit something in your life to meet the requirements of that outcome.
To prevent our health services becoming overwhelmed and losing more lives through collateral damage.
I've not seen that video - if they are good luck to them, they need a break and a pat on the back for going back into work everyday and helping everyone who is suffering. I'm not sure I could be so brave to put myself in that situation each day at work.
I'm not sure whereabouts you're based, but that wasn't the case where I live, or what I saw from friends in London.
So it's one rule for you, because you've decided you're doing your own exit plan, and another set of rules for everyone else? How would things look if everyone took the same selfish outlook?
I disagree, Those of us that had it, knew we had not had that before and we commented on it at the time. I read a blog post the other day, someone limited google to Dec 31st 2019 and went searching for "flu like symptoms". Then tried it for 2018, and there was nothing on the same scale. Try it and see. I think there was a 1000% spike in flu like cases in Australia in 2019 according to a Sky news article for July 2019.
Just nonsense. You tell others to try it, but you don't bother trying it yourself.
https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=today 5-y&q=flu like symptoms
This thread is utterly toxic
I think this is why there could be discussions around a phased exit plan, for different areas of the Country, as there's obviously big differences in population density, and likely why London has been such a hot spot.
Did he say that? Genuine question as I've not followed them all.
Does anyone have any theories about supermarket workers?
I just googled "supermarket corona death" "tesco corona death" and "supermarket worker dies from corona"
There's not many articles about shop workers dying, only a few about a single person, none like "x amount have passed away" apart from one US report about 30
So it is not happening? aren't there deaths? or are news agencies told not to report it for fear of scaring shop workers away from their jobs when they're needed
You're not reading into what you're trying to say and even one of the articles you've posted goes against what you've said. If dig into things you will see where it starts to fall apart.
The CNBC article you linked to for example only really states that in the US, they had a long flu season. If you look at the data (https://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/burden/index.html), you will see the 2018-2019 flu season was rather normal.
The CNBC article even specifically states that the 18-19 season, was not as bad as the one before it. The 17-18 season was actually rather high/bad compared to normal. The worse in many many years infact.
Unless you want to argue the possible case of coronavirus being in the US in 2017-2018 flu season, then it goes against your point.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.