- Joined
- Feb 14, 2005
- Posts
- 488
- Reaction score
- 13
aqls said:I can't make it, sorry.
But can someone bring up that dreadful case of potential fraud that has had it's thread deleted (on purpose)?
If anyone wants a reminder of what it was, pm and I can refresh.
-aqls-
rob said:IP Check? To check he has one?!
I am all for openness - thus its blindingly obvious who I am - and would not say open IP's / required info in profiles / etc is needed, more the mindset of "this bloke doesnt want people to know his name and there is a reason for it".
There are a few on the forum who like to be anon or claim to be other people, and it is highly amusing when you read their posts bearing in mind their own lack of transparency
grandin said:By asking the two questions we should cover everything...but not return home until the 30th
Lee
grandin said:are you the jack or another jack...........i am getting confused with all these many names....ole has a boy and girls name.......i suppose its all about who has the most names
lee
Whois-Search said:Can we have a ip check on jack_the_hat please admin ?
Also anything "fraud" related should be reported through the proper channels.
Jac said:Andrew,
Considering admin censored a thread wherein some posters alleged that Nominet allows fraud to take place; and that's how it read (as in red) to me; I would find it rather inappropriate now, if admin started publishing people's IP addresses. If people want to remain anonymous that's actually okay with me, but if they are going to make accusations against Nominet or anybody else, it would be nice if they had the good grace not to hide behind nicknames... (oh, and pigs might fly too).
Regards
James Conaghan
[me, myself and nobody else]
Jac said:So far Beasty, Sneezycheese, Olebean, Whois-Search and possible one other have confirmed.
If anyone else would like to join us for a Q+A at Nominet Oxford on the 22nd June (12 to 3pm) please confirm your details to my private email [email protected] - lunch is provided.
Hopefully Hazel (PAB Member) can make it too.
Jac said:Unfortunately Hazel cannot attend so you're stuck with me from the PAB side. :twisted:
Regards
James Conaghan
[PAB Member]
olebean said:There was a previous requests for a webcast of the meeting (Voyuers!) is this an option and have you had more than one request for it.
Whois-Search said:I think only the AGM gets a webcast.......
Though you could take your cine film camera olebean
Whois-Search said:
olebean said:Jac
I think what he (originator of the thread) was getting at, was not necessarily a fraud having taken place, but, the apparent ease at which things occurred. They could have kept quiet about it and I fully understand his reluctance to provide further details. If the a security loophole exists/existed, whether through lapse in quality, training etc etc the issue is serious... In these circumstances, I feel it maybe prudent to resolve him and others from any repercussions, considering they volunteered the information.
Whois-Search said:I think only the AGM gets a webcast.......
Though you could take your cine film camera olebean
olebean said:There was me thinking I would meet the Old Gal! :-D
Hazel Pegg said:Send me a ticket to Rarotonga and I may just show
Hazel
Hazel Pegg said:Send me a ticket to Rarotonga and I may just show
Hazel
sneezycheese said:The point I was trying to make was that Nominet versus Companies House wasn’t a like for like comparison; in fact it’s quite the opposite.
you are leaking infoAdmin said:Hello. So, do anyone happen to know anything about Whois and how it can be accessed?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.