- Joined
- Mar 26, 2007
- Posts
- 2,393
- Reaction score
- 147
Again, recorded, police system has improved. More crimes being reported != more crimes, nor does that directly correlate to capital punishment whatsoever.
So you're saying that a lot of murders used to go unreported??????????????
Re-read the post.
Have - still not making sense.
I am trying to have a proper debate, not spout facts without backing them up or ignoring your points because I don't have an answer.
Ashton - how does that equate to saying stuff like 'there's no proof that CP is a deterent'? We had less crime when we had it. You can't back up your claim...full stop!
Capital Punishment is revenge. You kill someone, you get killed. Also called retribution, retaliation, vengeance or "payback"
Does imprisonment differ as a notion than community service? Is one different from the other or are they both forms of punishment? So it is with CP. Only you are putting an emotional slant on it.
This is a punitive measure - it is not aimed to improve the human condition, it is merely aimed to kill another human being.
No. it is aimed at reducing similar cases from occuring.
How can you teach that killing is wrong by killing?
How can you NOT? I mean, really? If you say to someone "if you steal £1m, we'll fine you £500k" how many more thefts do you think there'd be?
Most people I have spoken to choose to support capital punishment because of an emotional response evoked by the criminals actions, for example - who wouldn't be enraged by a person who kills children. That is why I see it and it's support as highly emotionally based. Its people using their heart, not their head.
These people you've spoken to have said that, have they? That their opinions are based soley on their emotions and that they don't use their brains to form their opinions? That's correct is it? Give me a break....
I prefer to use my head and look at all the options and in my conclusion, life imprisonment is far superior to capital punishment.
Strange that. You claim that you're only using your head but it is you who brought the notion of emotion into the debate, and like I've said, it has no place in trying to decide suitable punishment.
It stands to reason, but that doesn't make it true, there is no evidence supporting that the death penalty is a larger deterrent than lifetime imprisonment.
WHY DO YOU KEEP IGNORING THE FACT THAT WHEN WE HAD CP, THERE WERE FEWER MURDERS?
I CAN'T SAY FOR SURE, BUT I'LL BET A £ TO A PINCH OF SHIT THAT THERE WEREN'T MANY UNREPORTED MURDERS BACK WHEN THE UK HAD CP.
IGNORING THE SIMPLE COLD LOGIC OF THAT WILL NOT MAKE IT GO AWAY, AND FOR ANYONE ELSE WHO MAY STILL BE READING, I'M SURE THEY ARE WONDERING WHY YOU CONTINUALLY DISREGARD THIS FACT.
There is also no evidence supporting that lifetime imprisonment is a higher deterrent than the death penalty.
Well, there can't be can there.
Its something you come to expect - I am also pretty public about my age on this forum. Anyway, lets just stick to the debate at hand.
Well it's news to me - just how old are you? You don't have to answer if you don't want.
Incidently, if it's something other people have picked up on, maybe you should be thinking there's a reason?
Crime rate has raised at a constant since before and after capital punishment was abolished. There is no correlation between capital punishment abolition and increased crime.
Again, no evidence of it as a deterrent, please actually stick to fact.
I have - only you won't acknowledge it.
Without the 'death row' and appeal process, far more executions of innocents would happen.
Once again, fewer innocent people would die.
What's better; 1 innocent person being killed, or 2? Hard choice, but when all is said and done, there's no choice at all is there?
Im growing tired of you spouting crap like 'capital punishment is a proven deterrent' there is no scientific proof of this whatsoever, nor is there proof that it isn't.
Ashton, sweetheart...more murders in the UK before, or after CP was abolished?
Yes or no? It's a simple question.