Wikileaks pulled!

[philipp]

Just popped in. Interesting to see that AD is nuttier than ever these days

P.

 

[crabfoot]

Just popped in. Interesting to see that AD is nuttier than ever these days P.

Yeh right, DB - evidence of extraterrestrial life in Bayswater, run by Spymaster Fag End from Andalucia, taking over from Ante Pavelic and the Vatican Connection.

I used to know a man in Windsor that wrote a book about the Jewish Socialist conspiracy to rule the world. Last time I saw him, he was driving a taxi ... then again, last time I saw HRH The Princess Royal she was coming in third in a hunter chase ...

 

[BREWSTERS]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-11929034

Now the Swiss are bowing to pressure.

 

[binny]

Can't help thinking that Wikileaks if not created by the US government has been fed and nurtured by western governments as a vehicle for achieving tighter control of the internet. It has lauded as a bastion of internet freedom but is more than likely the beginning of the end.

With the Assange dude's imminent arrest, imprisonment and electrotherapy it all points to high fives at the next G20.

 

[Bailey]

Maybe wiki was about to tell about the exsistance of exterterestrial life

From The US perspective :shock:

Now wouldn't you like to be reading those files

 

[Bailey]

Just popped in. Interesting to see that AD is nuttier than ever these days

P.

That avitar looks familiar - Not another refugee from DomainState surely

 

[Ashton]

Arrested: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11937110

 

[GreyWing]

One one hand he wants the law to protect him, yet showed no regards for law when he published stolen documents.

Live by the sword die by the sword fella......

 

[edo]

It isn't illegal to publish stolen documents though. Otherwise the editor of The Telegraph would be in jail for publishing all the MPs' second home info.

If you're a Wikileaks fan, here's the link to donate to them:

https://donations.datacell.com/

Cheers,

Ed

 

[GreyWing]

It isn't illegal to publish stolen documents though. Otherwise the editor of The Telegraph would be in jail for publishing all the MPs' second home info.

If you're a Wikileaks fan, here's the link to donate to them:

https://donations.datacell.com/

Cheers,

Ed

Yes it is illegal in this country to publish stolen secrets. In theory yes the editors are liable, but this country seems to take the view that as they aren't our state secrets, then not our job to prosecute. But if they were our secrets then we have the laws to prosecute, the yanks don't seem to have those laws.

 

[edo]

In that case the editor of the Guardian should be arrested as the Wikileaks files - which the Guardian have been publishing - contain information which threaten British national security, according to the Foreign Office.

 

[GreyWing]

In that case the editor of the Guardian should be arrested as the Wikileaks files - which the Guardian have been publishing - contain information which threaten British national security, according to the Foreign Office.

The British government have taken the view that it's either not in the public interest, not in the Government interest to prosecute or don't have a realistic possibility of conviction.

But technically yes he could be done for it,

 

[monaghan]

Aren't we missing something major...

If these documents have been leaked, then how secure actually is the system? How many more real secrets are in the hands of "the enemy" rather than being published on the web?

 

[jasman]

I think it's a set-up. It's funny how wikileaks whose main audience is the West is publishing loads of stuff about places like Afghanistan. How come they're not talking about all the dodgy things going on in the US and the UK? Because that would really open peoples eyes up. The establishment would never let such a thing explode in the mass media if it was focussing on that. And it's funny how they're having this big media circus right now at the same time that the UK and the US are quietly bringing in loads of Internet censorship legislation which the general public is ignorant about. It's a set-up job. They're leaking a load of bollocks that they're not that bothered about people finding out about mixed with loads of misinformation, while the stuff they really want to keep out of the spotlight stays hidden.

Meanwhile they're brainwashing people into thinking it's wrong for websites to publish stolen documents etc even if it unearths government corruption, in the hope that in the end there will be enough public sympathy for wikileaks to be pulled and the new censorship legislation justified. How convenient.

 

[BREWSTERS]

Want to see their servers? Like a Bond villians bunker;

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-11965864