We could really use more big hitters like pokerstars to add to the list if it's going to work. Nhs.uk and Parliament.uk are interesting ones. NHS has been on .UK forever and any government ones are non-commercial so they're not going to be as much of a draw to persuade others to switch. Worthy of the list I reckon nontheless.
I could have put rainbows and unicorns on there but I'm not sure it would be as relevant.It is a bad sign when it needs a list to try and convince people.
People need to be very careful, at the moment we're in a bull market driven by hype, off the back of a few over ambitious DL bids.
Firstly, one of the reasons for having a great domain is to add to the brand value/authority in the marketplace - diving.uk will add more brand value than diving123.co.uk
Diving.uk is like having a shop on diving shop on Oxford Street and Diving123.co.uk is like having a shop in the Walsall town centre...
Secondly, it's also about people's perceptions...
Example: for content/informational/authority sites:
Diabetes.uk looks far more authoritative than Diabetes.co.uk
.
I am very much a "want to own both uk tld" type person so maybe its just the way I think. I think a good example of that is evergreen.uk , amazingly brandable generic phrase..love the name. But 1. It's generic and oversaturated, 2. It has an established brand on the other uk tld. You'd have to either have a Big marketing budget, or simply not care that your potential customers may easily go somewhere else or not be able to find you which then just means you've got the domain for bragging rights that you've got a dictionary word TLD.
People need to be very careful, at the moment we're in a bull market driven by hype, off the back of a few over ambitious DL bids.
If your niche was different to the evergreen co.uk site, surely people will realisit'sts not what they were after and either keep looking or go do something else. If the uk name space gets to a point where the uk is part of the general landscape, will it be any different than having say a .net or a com.
If that we're the case and people would look beyond the top 10 when searhing for things, but as you know the percentage of searches which actually get to the second page of results is minimal in comparison. People are lazy, if you can't put it in front of their eyes then you're losing a huge amount of potential customers before you've started, making it easy for people is half the battle.
On the other hand, there are names being purchased which a more brandable.....which already have an estbalished brand on the .co.uk...
Someone special who might have used a hyphen or uk.com instead
Exactly why I bought cooper.uk. I've had cooper.uk.com for many years but wanted to secure the .uk since nominet announced it.
£560 well spent in my opinion.
I'd agree, nice buy, I tried to get my surname in .uk , the owner wants £10k for it though so that's not happening.
AddedI think shopping.uk went for £45k
Also just made it so that it works in it's basic form on mobile. Thinking of changing the name to https://switchto.uk
you are leaking infoAdmin said:Hello. So, do anyone happen to know anything about Whois and how it can be accessed?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.