I was watching sky news and they were interviewing an ex cia man who had been working on the tracking for years. I couldn't believe when he said They had located him on 10 seperate occassions but then president Bill Clinton chose not to act each time.
Conspiracy theories abound...
He is still alive. He shaved his beard off, washed his pits, sold his corner shop in Birmingham and ran for US president. Surely it's obvious to everyone that's why the US want to confirm his death for the 2nd time. He is alive and well in Washington.
Why do people always have to chip in with some comment about "conspiracy theories" and then turn the whole thing into some ludicrous joke? Look at the $billions various oil and weopons companies are making from the wars (and one of them is even managing the UK census now). Look at who funds presidential campaigns. Look at the gigantic transfer of wealth to the banks. Look at the various people in key positions who get bumped off. Of course there are conspiracies in the world, and you don't need to start cooking up theories, the accepted facts speak for themselves.
Instead of turning it all into a piss take so you can try and get a laugh from a few people, why not focus on the facts that people are highlighting to you. You might learn something.
As it happens, fresh79 is correct. The first Osama had a grey beard, the later Osama had a black beard and has different facial features. A little odd don't you think?
And didn't you know that on 9/11 three skyscrapers collapsed in New York? One, known as Building 7, was not hit by a plane, and yet collapsed in freefall speed just like the Twin Towers. What an extraordinary coincidence, now just how did that happen?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ujWitEr-Ww
And quel surprise, the collapse of Building 7 was not included in the 911 Commission's remit either.
you do know it's an al jazeera interview don't you? lol
hee hee, that's brilliant, just confirms my theory
So would anyone who believes the official 9/11 story like to furnish an explanation for the collapse of Building 7?
So it's an Al Jazeera interview -- And ??? I haven't even followed this link but I'll take their word over the BBC's any day of the week covering international news -- granted this one is close to home and potential for bias is always going to be there on this topic (but it's by no means guaranteed).
The BBC, Faux News, Sky news or Aljazeera -- I know where my money would be for some presentation of the facts, interpretation of events and subsequent objective reporting. The BBC are the biggest jokers -- takes some doing beating faux news but they manage it.
Jasman, im all for conspiracy theories and ill be the first to accept that alot goes on behind the scenes, but the whole 9/11 thing is getting really old now.
It is an insult to all the people who died and their families to keep banging on about how their own government did it, especially when all your evidence is based on documentries and internet findings.
The real conspiracy is the conspiracy documentries and sites aimed at making money from people like you who watch them religiously and keep coming back for more. They are the ones laughing!!
...the vibration and detritus of the surrounding buildings which weakened considerably the foundations. Do you know how many stories below ground those towers went to? Lets just say, massive double digit depths. Oh and *No* bomb was detonated inside each tower to coincide with the planes.
There is no scientist who has ever considered the collapse as anything other than because of the two planes impacting the towers.
you are leaking infoAdmin said:Hello. So, do anyone happen to know anything about Whois and how it can be accessed?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.