I never said it would be able to take on the top catchers, but as an alternative to spending £40 a time on domain monster and others, for £15 a month or if you had a membership and no script, this beats it by a mile.
After all it has done pretty well up to now using hosting that costs a couple of £ a month.
So with the new server I agree with you, it should do much better.
So you heard it here, as said by Monaghan an experienced domainer, the script I currently use on shared hosting costing buttons, will for the service be based on a brand new 8 core 32gb ram server, so should be much faster.
And just for anone a bit short who buys the script, you can have your own hosting if you wish for a couple of £'s a month while you build up your portfolio.
Thank you to all the messages of support, and infact the poor messages, every single one, makes me more and more committed
PS
Ive heard that for years and years, people have been spouting about how hard it is to get a good script, but I agree with Monaghan also, a script isn't actually that big.
But as an invitation, to azooza I think who said it couldnt catch owt, why dont we put our scripts against each other.
Yours costs £15,000 according to your website, and this one just £200, ok yours may have more features, but for a purely catching competition, lets put them up against each other.
They both poll at the max rate, so lets choose some domains, set them to poll the same hours, and lets see over a week which script catches the most.
We would have to get someone independent and trustworhy, to host the scripts at the same place of course, but should show if the one that costs £14,800 less is worthy.
Nothing like a good David Versus Goliath contest is there.