What would you say is the minimum amount of word content per page in order for it to be effective in the eyes of google? Since the launch of google panda, how many keyword mentions or referrals would you need in said content?
Hey WW
I have a site that, before the Panda update came in, had just crept on to page 1 for main keyword (which is also URL). Now since the update and the noticeable impact it has plummeted out of the rankings altogether.
I have had a look at the site again and:
1. Cleared up text that appeared the same across all pages;
2. Added ALT tags to each image;
3. Added H text tags to home page;
4. Started increasing the amount of words per review (I assume this is now a factor based on Panda for 'review' sites??);
5. Removed the repitition for keyword on home page (I have probably removed around 5-6 occurances);
I need to start linkbuilding (just not the best at it and the least fun part of a site build)
Anything else you can see that you would do to rank again and start competing with the .org.uk which seems to be doing very nicely
www.pressurewasherreviews.co.uk
Cheers!
Hi do you find you need all meta tags e.g description, keywords etc as I notice you don't use them on treadmills I thought they are quite important is it less so now?
You mentioned getting squidoo links.
Some of my links from Squidoo seem to be dofollow, some seem to be nofollow.
Any thoughts on this?
This lens http://www.squidoo.com/driving-lessons (not mine) has a list of driving school links - a link to one of my sites is at positon 12 and is flagged up as no follow.
I have another link to a different site in another one of these lists on a different lens - so maybe it is the link lists that are nofollowed by squidoo
All links in that Squidoo numbered list are showing as no follow, not just yours.
Does anyone know what the criteria are for squidoo nofollows? Is it just the link lists that are no-followed or any others?
Hey cc976a,
The work you have done already sounds good. Remember to do the following though.
Create both a .xml sitemap and static one
Interlink between pages
I notice the site has only 3 backlinks, and most of the other sites have 100+. This is probably where your problem is. You have my email address, if you send me a half decent article I will put it up on this pr6 site I am an admin on free of charge with a backlink to your site on it.
Cheers and good luck with the site.
WigWam
Here's a question for you.
I bought a domain from Sedo, and the parking page was indexed in Google. When doing a search in Google for "Domain.co.uk" without the quotes, the top result was the domain along with parking page. Since I bought the domain this has been changed to a single page of decent content, which was then updated in the search results within a couple of days.
This was a few weeks ago. Now for some reason it doesn't rank when searching for the domain, but it's still indexed when using the "site:" operator. Nothing spammy has been done, and as of yet no link building has been done either.
I've done the same on a few domains before which were bought from Sedo (i.e. the Sedo parking was previously indexed and there were no backlinks) and this has never happened. Hoping it hasn't been penalised for some reason already, as it wasn't exactly a cheap domain and I want it developed soon... Any ideas?
Cheers for that! I've added the sitemap. Thanks for the offer of listing an article - I'll ping one over.
Hi Rob,Any ideas why this site - MaldivesBargains co/uk just got dropped by big G?
Until very recently it had various decent rankings which brought highly relevant traffic in and now it's all gone and only ranks for the exact domain query.
Thanks a lot & best of luck with your consultancy.
Rob
I've just recently added a forum to one of my sites (see sig) hoping that the forum posts (giving unique content) will get indexed by goog. All the listings you see on main part of site are from a feed (so dupe content).
Is this a waste of time / is there a better way to approach the dupe content issue?
Thnx
><(((o>
Hi,
Bit of a strange one that, I have had a few clients ask me this in the past.
Odds are that since it has little / no links, google gives little value to it (hence the worse rankings). If it was listed in sedo (a high pr, authority site) it would have links pointing towards it that gave it some credit. Also sedo's sales holding page may have been 301'ed from their site which would make it part of an authority site. Remember that sedo pages have relevant text on them and although they have a high nfobl they are rather well designed towards the search engines.
I would advice that you start building links slowly, start with lower quality links such as directory & blog comments (less that 50 a day if possible), it should get back to n1 no problem at all.
Cheers
WigWam
Thanks for the reply.
Yeah it's a strange one, I would have thought it would at least rank for the full domain name as I've got a few domains with no backlinks at all which rank fine for theirs.
On a separate note though for another website, if you've got a pricelist for your services yet drop me a PM.
Hi WW,
Just wanted to wish you all the very best of luck with your launch, I'm sure you'll be very successful with your new venture.
I've posted here before about Feeding.co.uk - of which I'm still struggling to rank with the term 'feeding', despite having made some recent improvements. The site features totally original content and work too.
I'd be grateful for any ideas or suggestions you may have - many thanks.
Install an auto internal link plugin
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.