9/11 Charlie Sheen / your views

[tifosi]

Princess Di did it. The UK government hatched a plot in the early 90's to frame the Windsors for the 'so called' killing of princess Di while they could secretly infilitrate her as an al qaeda operative - after the sex change of course. Little did they know that she would change her name to Osama 'di' Bin Laden and declare a holy fatwa on all western governments!

 

[domainseller200]

Princess Di did it. The UK government hatched a plot in the early 90's to frame the Windsors for the 'so called' killing of princess Di while they could secretly infilitrate her as an al qaeda operative - after the sex change of course. Little did they know that she would change her name to Osama 'di' Bin Laden and declare a holy fatwa on all western governments!

Only someone with a website about nav sats could say that

 

[GreyWing]

By the way don't get m,e wrong some very dodgy stuff goes on like this (Hitler and Col Gadaffi) both got involved in smaller versions of acts like this against their own people.

I'm just saying that even if they wanted to, this is miles too big to pull off and needed to many people to keep quiet.

 

[tifosi]

Only someone with a website about nav sats could say that

DON'T MOCK THE AFFILICTED! I sell watches too.

But at least you know where Di went...

 

[aZooZa]

By the way don't get m,e wrong some very dodgy stuff goes on like this (Hitler and Col Gadaffi) both got involved in smaller versions of acts like this against their own people.

I'm just saying that even if they wanted to, this is miles too big to pull off and needed to many people to keep quiet.

Indeed so Graeme, Churchill too when it comes to it, but I agree with your stance on all this - pure nonsense

 

[domainseller200]

Explain this one then (only will take 2 minutes of your time)

YouTube - Unfastened Coins: Titanic Conspiracy

This is 100% concerte evidence (with proof) that the titanic was a cover up.

Watch the video to be blown away !

 

[aZooZa]

Explain this one then (only will take 2 minutes of your time)

YouTube - Unfastened Coins: Titanic Conspiracy

This is 100% concerte evidence (with proof) that the titanic was a cover up.

Watch the video to be blown away !

That's a spoof video. It's laughable! I assume you're joking as well? Ice incredibly melting faster than metal? A guy banging a tin boat on an ice cube in the bath?

 

[GreyWing]

Yep as Dale says I think it's a pee take.

The titanic was at the bottom because it was a flawed design. Brunel's great eastern was correctly designed and stayed a float with a breach twice as big.

No conspiracy just flawed designing and materials I'm afraid.

But if this guy is serious in his film about ice not being able to sink iron ships then all he needs to do is watch deadliest catch on discovery every week.

 

[aZooZa]

Drive your car into a piece of ice the size of a dustbin (adjust speed upwards for relativity) and post the results here

 

[domainseller200]

lol of course im joking - I couldn't stop laughing when I watched it ha ha ha !!

Just thought I would lighten the mood here

"If ice is stronger than stell - why don't they make boats from ice"

Ha ha !

 

[Rich]

"If ice is stronger than steel - why don't they make boats from ice"

Ha ha !

In the 2nd world war they looked at the practicalities of building ships out of frozen water/ sawdust mix as they would take years to melt and could withstand torpedo attacks

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pykrete

 

[GreyWing]

In the 2nd world war they looked at the practicalities of building ships out of frozen water/ sawdust mix as they would take years to melt and could withstand torpedo attacks

Or the bats armed with fire bombs to bomb japan, and tests showed they would have worked.

 

[aZooZa]

There's a business buzz down my way - the chocolate teapot business is burgeoning.

 

[cm1975]

I haven't seen the Charlie Sheen thing, but there are some weird things that happened around 9/11.

The two that stick in my mind -

1 - The scene of the Pentagon crash showed no apparent signs of a aircraft crashing.

2 - The BBC reported the collapse of WTC7 something like 30 minutes before it actually fell to the ground.

These two things may be explainable, but I can see how conspiracy theorists can put these things together with many other events and come up with some "ideas".

 

[aZooZa]

I haven't seen the Charlie Sheen thing, but there are some weird things that happened around 9/11.

The two that stick in my mind -

1 - The scene of the Pentagon crash showed no apparent signs of a aircraft crashing.

2 - The BBC reported the collapse of WTC7 something like 30 minutes before it actually fell to the ground.

These two things may be explainable, but I can see how conspiracy theorists can put these things together with many other events and come up with some "ideas".

1. No CTv is set to 700fps.
2. American TV did.

 

[cm1975]

1. No CTv is set to 700fps.
2. American TV did.

1. Obviously I'm no expert, but when you see the stills of the impact on the building, then it really doesn't look like a plane hit it.

All the CCTV that might have captured the incident at the Pentagon was confiscated within the hour and has not seen the light of day since .... allegedly.

2. Is it not strange that anyone reported the distruction of WTC7, when it wasn't hit in the attack and there was no great reason to think it would fall?

 

[aZooZa]

1. Obviously I'm no expert, but when you see the stills of the impact on the building, then it really doesn't look like a plane hit it.

All the CCTV that might have captured the incident at the Pentagon was confiscated within the hour and has not seen the light of day since .... allegedly.

2. Is it not strange that anyone reported the distruction of WTC7, when it wasn't hit in the attack and there was no great reason to think it would fall?

Give the maniac theories a rest?

 

[retired_member12]

All the CCTV that might have captured the incident at the Pentagon was confiscated within the hour and has not seen the light of day since ....

Blimey CM, 500mph = 220m/s. A 757-200 in only 48m long, so a cctv at 25fps would only catch 5 frames for the whole length of the plane to pass by. With the best will in the world, the plane would only be a blur anyway!

 

[cm1975]

Blimey CM, 500mph = 220m/s. A 757-200 in only 48m long, so a cctv at 25fps would only catch 5 frames for the whole length of the plane to pass by. With the best will in the world, the plane would only be a blur anyway!

Forget about the CCTV, as I didn't even mention it in my first post. I was referring to camera pictures of the outside of the building. There were no signs of aviation fuel, wings, a tail, or engines?

 

[GreyWing]

Forget about the CCTV, as I didn't even mention it in my first post. I was referring to camera pictures of the outside of the building. There were no signs of aviation fuel, wings, a tail, or engines?

YouTube - F-4 Crash Test

What do expect it to do bounce off?