Pedigree
This person's identity was being called into question, most older members believed it was you if I recall. Maybe that's why you remember the post, did it strike a nerve?
No, I did not
remember the post and, no it didn't strike a nerve. I was prompted to look at the post in question which appears to have been made by your forum account almost three years ago. You may locate it on the forum by searching for the word "identity".
My identity has never been questioned as most of the members, who have actively been using the forum for the past few years, know who I am.
You may wish to introduce
"to my knowledge" into your above statement because you cannot be expected to know about anything you've not been made aware of. The same rule must also apply to me, in that I could not be expected to know about anything I was not made aware of.
I wouldn't post my full name on any forum, happy to use my first name, which appears to be sufficient for
@Helmuts and
@Sam.
Why specifically will you not post your full name on this forum after having posted 1507 separate times, over the course of about 4 years? Those two users you cited, and others, might be even more delighted to know your full name.
Out of interest, of all the members who aren't using their names, which there appear to be many, why did you only call on 2 members to change theirs. What's the agenda? Surely you've seen my tags and have checked Nominet's list of registrar's and seen my posts on the Nominet community forum?
You ask what my agenda is. It is to respond to some of the usernames who have posted in this thread, some in direct reply to me. Your username was inserted into the thread within
this post and that is why I have responded to you.
You have not explained why you believe I should surely have seen your tags, which you have not identified, or why I should therefore have checked Nominet's list of registrars, or why I should have seen posts on the Nominet Community forum, or how I should have identified such posts as being related to your username on this forum.
I cannot recall ever being made aware of your tags (it appears that in the post I cited, from 2020, made by your username, you mention you are not a tag holder). You have also not explained how I should go about deducing that any tags I may find are connected to your username so, to save further time, I invite you to make me and anyone else reading aware of this and any other pertinent information so we can know who you are.
I am a member of the Nominet Community forum but I have not yet posted there and I afford very little time to reading it.
Lazaus
Not at all, I personally don't object to that. But that's my preference, I can't speak for others.
That's because we have not yet done business together.
https://www.colin.uk - Feel free to connect
- In my above comments about Verified Statuses. I am merely suggesting in my opinion how such a feature should work. That is... if Admin did ever consider implementing it.
Thank you for the invitation to connect, Colin. I have done business with people I have forgotten that I did business with so, from my perspective, I may have encountered you on prior occasions and forgotten.
Gimpydog
And so it begins (again)...
invincible said: ↑
@gimpydog has been member here since August 2004 and to my knowledge has never publically identified who he/she but is quite prepared to accuse me of operating profiles that I did not operate. That's another absurdity because who's to say the
@gimpydog profile isn't a duplication of another profile that exists here? It's impossible.
Here, in this
post made by forum username
@gimpydog, there is another link to a post that appears to be dated December 2020 added by you. In that other post it is stated that I had been
banned again and makes reference to a name that I do not know. The inference made in
@gimpydog's post with the inclusion of the additional link, which
@gimpydog could only have located by doing some research, is that
@gimpydog believes I operate other profiles. I do not not operate other profiles.
Please stop playing your games. You're not at
school now. I wont be bullied by you.
The attempts at bullying here have been by you. Initially in the post made by your username
here, and as detailed above. Afterwards in this post made by your username
here, where you link to the WHOIS output of a domain name that is an acronym of a school that I once attended and is information you would have had to research to find out since, as far as I am aware, we do not know each other. It is information that has no relevance to this topic but which you have decided to introduce here to try to cause an effect on me, which is a form of bullying.
It is hypocritical for you to suggest you won't be bullied by me, when I am doing nothing of the sort, and when you appear to be the one trying to bully me.
Your username has existed on this forum since 2004, has posted 563 separate times in almost 20 years, and to my knowledge you have never revealed who you are. On that basis you could theoretically be operated by anyone which should devoid you of a lot of credibility.