- Joined
- Feb 14, 2005
- Posts
- 488
- Reaction score
- 13
This is .net but it should be "case law" for .xx.uk
"Complainant asserts that Respondent registered the Domain Name in bad faith because Respondent has offered to sell the Domain Name. Although circumstances indicating that Respondent registered the Domain Name primarily for the purpose of selling it to Complainant or one of its competitors would be considered evidence of bad faith, to establish such bad faith, Complainant would have to show that Respondent was aware of Complainant’s trademark when Respondent registered the Domain Name."
http://arbiter.wipo.int/domains/decisions/html/2006/d2006-0446.html
"Complainant asserts that Respondent registered the Domain Name in bad faith because Respondent has offered to sell the Domain Name. Although circumstances indicating that Respondent registered the Domain Name primarily for the purpose of selling it to Complainant or one of its competitors would be considered evidence of bad faith, to establish such bad faith, Complainant would have to show that Respondent was aware of Complainant’s trademark when Respondent registered the Domain Name."
http://arbiter.wipo.int/domains/decisions/html/2006/d2006-0446.html