Top Domain Investors What They See for 2016

[Sound]

Top Domain Investors What They See for 2016

Great read for people interested in dot coms

Warning not for people who don't like change or who are stuck in 1990.

http://domainshane.com/asked-5-top-domain-investors-see-2016-said/#comment-210381

 

[martin-s]

Interesting on .cc

I still call bubble on nn/nnn/nnnn domains. Can't personally see much use.

LLLL is similar. Too many that aren't good acronyms and aren't pronounceable are just overvalued junk.

 

[gimpydog]

I still call bubble on nn/nnn/nnnn domains. Can't personally see much use.

They work well for mobile devices in asia. 360.com, 163.com, 1905.com, 51.la etc.

Numbers are numbers pretty much everywhere in the world.

 

[martin-s]

They work well for mobile devices in asia. 360.com, 163.com, 1905.com, 51.la etc.

Numbers are numbers pretty much everywhere in the world.

360, 365, 24, 247, I can see. A number with a bit of logic and meaning behind it.

But most numbers aren't ever going to be brands are they...

 

[Edwin]

This is worth a read if you're trying to get to grips with why numerics may be of value to Chinese buyers...
http://ggrg.com/numeric-domains-2-0-the-definitive-guide/

 

[martin-s]

Interesting, it's a very different culture for sure. Not something I'm going to dabble in (but I'm not really actively investing in anything).

 

[ian]

Good read, interesting views. Think it is very easy for them to say that LLL.com and LLLL.com's are where to be, as the point of entry is already very high.

Wonder if we could get a similar Q&A for the .co.uk market

 

[martin-s]

$45k for 3568.com ?!
http://dnjournal.com/domainsales.htm