your example is based around small businesses getting online and I think you have a good point about choice. Most plumbers arnt going to splash out 10k on plumbers .co.uk istead will go for the im-a-plumber-london .co.uk etc.
whats interesting is that they can't afford the best name and even if they could only one plumber can own plumbers .co.uk anyway! also all us domainser probably own the better names that they may have wanted should it have been available e.g. londonplumbers .co.uk etc. So the problem as I see it is three issues.
A. the plumber sees londonplumbers .co.uk is reg'd and thinks oh well i go for £6 reg fee crap it will do, dont really care.
B. the plumber sees londonplumbers .co.uk is reg'd, puts an offer in via sedo etc it gets refused and thinks oh well i go for £6 reg fee crap it will do.
C. the plumber sees londonplumbers .co.uk is reg'd, puts an offer in via sedo etc it gets accepted and gets a better domain - (everyone happy? :mrgreen: ).
so would it be fair to assume that good generic names & geo names mobiles .co.uk, london .co.uk etc can be safe in the knowledge that they are less susceptible to reg'fee duplication becuase if I build a business around london .co.uk it should have more cred than my-london-web-guide.me.uk, however, ironically - if my-london-web0guide.me.uk is a good site, does good in serps getting loads of traffic etc people using wont care if it was a 1ook name or £6 name...
whats interesting is that they can't afford the best name and even if they could only one plumber can own plumbers .co.uk anyway! also all us domainser probably own the better names that they may have wanted should it have been available e.g. londonplumbers .co.uk etc. So the problem as I see it is three issues.
A. the plumber sees londonplumbers .co.uk is reg'd and thinks oh well i go for £6 reg fee crap it will do, dont really care.
B. the plumber sees londonplumbers .co.uk is reg'd, puts an offer in via sedo etc it gets refused and thinks oh well i go for £6 reg fee crap it will do.
C. the plumber sees londonplumbers .co.uk is reg'd, puts an offer in via sedo etc it gets accepted and gets a better domain - (everyone happy? :mrgreen: ).
so would it be fair to assume that good generic names & geo names mobiles .co.uk, london .co.uk etc can be safe in the knowledge that they are less susceptible to reg'fee duplication becuase if I build a business around london .co.uk it should have more cred than my-london-web-guide.me.uk, however, ironically - if my-london-web0guide.me.uk is a good site, does good in serps getting loads of traffic etc people using wont care if it was a 1ook name or £6 name...