There are some brands which use generics and would be unlikely to win a dispute to take away perceived typos at arbitration. Exemple: a typo of the word “hotels” is a typo of a generic word that I suggest most of us understand the ordinary definition of. Making use of a typo of that as part of a registered domain name to direct internet visitors to hotel related content, whether that be an affiliation of hotels.com or an alternative, would not be considered cause to find abuse because the term is the generic word for the content. It would be typo dependent. Adding “Expedia” into it would likely be abusive.