- Joined
- Mar 3, 2012
- Posts
- 3,180
- Reaction score
- 1,290
No but someone said they have recordings of separate employees at <registrar> saying the <registry> has decided on certain names that are 'premium' and will be making sure they go to <registrar> to be auctioned.
Note I have *no* proof of this (I asked them to get names etc at both <registrar> and <registry> - I was told this will be coming in amongst other evidence of dodgy dealings) and we don't know if <registrar> is just talking rubbish or the person telling me is speaking the truth but will definitely be interesting to see the results next week and follow any repercussions in the next few months. It's probably just hearsay and I'm just conveying the gist. Have I covered my backside legally enough do you think?
Note I have *no* proof of this (I asked them to get names etc at both <registrar> and <registry> - I was told this will be coming in amongst other evidence of dodgy dealings) and we don't know if <registrar> is just talking rubbish or the person telling me is speaking the truth but will definitely be interesting to see the results next week and follow any repercussions in the next few months. It's probably just hearsay and I'm just conveying the gist. Have I covered my backside legally enough do you think?