GDPR and Google dfp/adsense

[Skinner]

I just had a chat with a guy who does Adult Sites, he tells me the adult industry solution to this is easy, in simple terms its a modified Age-Gate, you know the Whats your DOB, Enter Here or Leave.

Nothing is loaded until this is completed, Whats your date of birth... do you accept cookie policy, do you accept gdpr, can we have your first born etc all on check boxes. He wasn't sure if they are linking this to a database, so he doesn't know if it always asks you, or if its purely cookie/session based so the idea seems solid.

 

[mark]

@mark, where you say you've done as Murray suggested, where in the Adsense account is the bit where you opt to display non-personalised ads? I had a look in my account but can't see anything relating to that

You've tagged me there rather than the OP, who is @markb.

Just to avoid confusion (as someone has e-mailed me, assuming I'm @markb) I just want to clarify that isn't me and I only post here is @mark

Thanks

 

[Systreg]

Sorry, missed the B off his name, I've corrected that in my earlier post now.

 

[anthony]

A tangent question, but what happens about the DRS reports where GDPR is concerned, are Nominet allowed to publish the parties names, or will they have to redact them?

 

[JMI]

I've already had one email from Nominet letting me know that my registrant details have been disclosed for a particular domain (before I had switched my info back on in the whois), so perhaps the same applies for publishing details of DRS outcomes "establishing, exercising or defending legal rights".



8.2.3:


s.35:
View attachment 1941

Presumably that can't bypass whois privacy if you've got it enabled, as in they only get the privacy address which is not that useful. I wonder what the minimum requirement is for a "legitimate reason" to disclose.

I wonder if Nominet will end up setting up GDPR lookup service.

 

[Edwin]

I imagine, based on the wording of that exemption, that law enforcement and other qualifying parties will get the real, unobscured details.

That's the entire point of the exemption, after all.

 

[anthony]

I've already had one email from Nominet letting me know that my registrant details have been disclosed for a particular domain (before I had switched my info back on in the whois), so perhaps the same applies for publishing details of DRS outcomes "establishing, exercising or defending legal rights".



8.2.3:


s.35:
View attachment 1941

Thanks for that. So it seems a vague area, open to interpretation of what are 'legal rights'.

 

[Skinner]

@Murray did you ever find a template ? I've read through various other sites and seems none I have found so far are near inclusive, everyones in the same boat I suspect.

ICO are telling my clients keep it simple, don't make it 100s of clauses just 1 paragraph per item, and unload most the small print to the providers.

As for who can request via that exemption my experience is its going to be a solicitor, infact with 1 exception every time I've had one of those it's been solicitors.

 

[Skinner]

I noticed TalkTalk have gone with the Age/Entry Gate, you either accept they have rights to your first born, can sell your soul to the devil etc or you can't use their website. There is no option to turn them off or control them, you either accept them or go whistle.

I suspect many others will go this route too.