I'm just watching sky news right now and seeing all the pompery.
All splendid. I for one would have been more proud if her majesty had forgoed the lot and donated our tax payers money to perhaps build a new primary school instead. We could have called it "jubilee primary" and it would have outlived her, Charles and all our memories of the river pageant, a concert and some fireworks.
Just my 2 cents.
.
Trouble is scooter - the world would be a pretty sad-place, if too much 'caring and sharing' took up your life
You couldn't have been more proud though could you because you wouldn't have even heard about it.I'm just watching sky news right now and seeing all the pompery.
All splendid. I for one would have been more proud if her majesty had forgoed the lot and donated our tax payers money to perhaps build a new primary school instead. We could have called it "jubilee primary" and it would have outlived her, Charles and all our memories of the river pageant, a concert and some fireworks.
Just my 2 cents.
.
That's a shame. What has been spent on this would most likely have been enough to keep both runing for a couple of years.Probably not - during the last government I saw a school and a hospital built that are now closed.
You do sound like those people who want to donate wealth that hasn't even been created.
Ouch did I touched a nerve there?
What I see is a govenment spending what has been created (my tax money. Private sector, real cash, not pretend public spending cash) on pompous lavishness. It is being spent on one of the richest people in the UK
OK bring it on everyone. I can take it ... :twisted:
.
Ouch did I touched a nerve there?
What I see is a govenment spending what has been created (my tax money. Private sector, real cash, not pretend public spending cash) on pompous lavishness. It is being spent on one of the richest people in the UK
OK bring it on everyone. I can take it ... :twisted:
.
I think the weakness in your argument might be that pound for pound, whoevers money it is, it could not have been spent better, the benefits are too enormous to list.
The vast, overwhelming majority of the celebration was NOT paid for by "the public".
http://www.channel4.com/news/who-pays-for-the-diamond-jubilee
you are leaking infoAdmin said:Hello. So, do anyone happen to know anything about Whois and how it can be accessed?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.