Membership is FREE, giving all registered users unlimited access to every Acorn Domains feature, resource, and tool! Optional membership upgrades unlock exclusive benefits like profile signatures with links, banner placements, appearances in the weekly newsletter, and much more - customized to your membership level!

Corona please read very important

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm not a scientist, surprise, surprise.
However I can't understand why government
didn't try to mass produce a face mask provided free
by the NHS. One mask to each person giving first
preference to the vulnerable. I know some arguments
against it but none so far have I found totally
convincing.

below the World health organization says.

•If you are healthy, you only need to wear a mask if you are taking care of a person with suspected 2019-nCoV infection.
•Wear a mask if you are coughing or sneezing.
•Masks are effective only when used in combination with frequent hand-cleaning with alcohol-based hand rub or soap and water.
•If you wear a mask, then you must know how to use it and dispose of it properly.
 
I'm not a scientist, surprise, surprise.
However I can't understand why government
didn't try to mass produce a face mask provided free
by the NHS. One mask to each person giving first
preference to the vulnerable. I know some arguments
against it but none so far have I found totally
convincing.

below the World health organization says.

•If you are healthy, you only need to wear a mask if you are taking care of a person with suspected 2019-nCoV infection.
•Wear a mask if you are coughing or sneezing.
•Masks are effective only when used in combination with frequent hand-cleaning with alcohol-based hand rub or soap and water.
•If you wear a mask, then you must know how to use it and dispose of it properly.

Masks are 1 wear only! (and not that effective)
 
Boris Johnson has unveiled a series of hugely stringent new restrictions to slow what he said was the now-rapid spread of coronavirus in the UK, including 14-day isolation for all households with symptoms, a warning against “non-essential” contact, including trips to pubs and clubs, and an end to all mass gatherings.

At the first of what is set to be daily Downing Street press conferences, Johnson said social distancing meant people should avoid “pubs, clubs, theatres and other social venues”.

These will not be ordered to close, but will be expected to do so voluntarily. People are also being urged to work from home when at all possible.

FYI. More details in the article at link...
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...ns-to-avoid-non-essential-contact-with-others

And here's some related material from the news conference he held a few minutes ago.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Government response today seems to have been a lot of talk and no real action. Can't see the logic in leaving schools open. I think you'll see them close daily, as teachers contract coronavirus. So in a week or two they'll shut all schools, and the virus will have spread a lot more.
 
Government response today seems to have been a lot of talk and no real action. Can't see the logic in leaving schools open. I think you'll see them close daily, as teachers contract coronavirus. So in a week or two they'll shut all schools, and the virus will have spread a lot more.

I think it's because schools aren't just for learning, they're also a free daycare so parents can go out and work

I'm sure there are a lot of doctors and nurses with young children that can't be left alone but they will be needed at work

What do you do, leave them with their grandparents? that seems like not the best idea atm

No great options any which way
 
but it will happen anyway - as soon as a teacher goes down with coronavirus - and a lot of parents will be working from home now. There is no easy way - but this will be a lot more messy and not nice for older teachers
 
I think it's because schools aren't just for learning, they're also a free daycare so parents can go out and work

I'm sure there are a lot of doctors and nurses with young children that can't be left alone but they will be needed at work

What do you do, leave them with their grandparents? that seems like not the best idea atm

No great options any which way

Apparently the plan is to keep them part open for kids of nhs and police etc:

https://www.tes.com/news/coronavirus-schools-close-all-children-key-workers
 
Government response today seems to have been a lot of talk and no real action. Can't see the logic in leaving schools open. I think you'll see them close daily, as teachers contract coronavirus. So in a week or two they'll shut all schools, and the virus will have spread a lot more.
I'd love the schools to close because our family can isolate ourselves for as long as necessary without it impacting others, but the gov are taking the right steps, if schools close, so do doctors and hospitals and avoidable deaths will occur.

Whilst the gov won't spell it out, they need the public to contract this disease naturally, to avoid too much strain on services to combat it. No point having everyone under lock and key only for it to attack when we return to our daily routines.
 
As I said this strategy won't last more than a week or two - so I see no point
 
As I said this strategy won't last more than a week or two - so I see no point

You're probably right, but the alternative of just carrying on as normal is dangerous too. They're buying time, but with no particularly pleasant outcome down the line as far as I can see. But realistically the elderly should stay indoors.. probably longer than the 3 or 4 months stated, but clearly that's not doable for many and has mental health and loneliness implications too.

'If' many millions of reasonably healthy people get it and get over it, and 'if' they then cannot contract it again (which is still an unknown), it might peter out eventually allowing some of the most vulnerable in society to escape it. Lots of ifs :s.
 
As I said this strategy won't last more than a week or two - so I see no point
Things will ramp up rapidly now, but that extra week or two for the NHS is vital.
 
Children catch the coronavirus at almost the same rate as adults (see link below) - but just don't show the symptons as much. So schools will become one large petri dish. Children infecting each other, then all the parents, and the teachers. Two weeks of this will, by far, outweigh any short term benefit.

https://www.livescience.com/can-kids-get-coronavirus.html
 
Children catch the coronavirus at almost the same rate as adults (see link below) - but just don't show the symptons as much. So schools will become one large petri dish. Children infecting each other, then all the parents, and the teachers. Two weeks of this will, by far, outweigh any short term benefit.

https://www.livescience.com/can-kids-get-coronavirus.html

Yes, I think that will happen as you say. And it's not like people can keep their distance from their own kids, so they will infect their parents etc. Of course there are problems with the alternative too, as if they close schools you get the grand parents looking after the kids and that of course comes with obvious concerns. I'm not sure there there is any quick or easy way out of this. It's starting to feel like the next year or two will be memorable for rather distressing reasons. Perhaps we should be thankful that it isn't even more vigilant, as we'd have likely have demonstrated the same approach to dealing with it. The world is just so well connected nowadays that this stuff spreads like wildfire.
 
Nobody is factoring in the numbers for locking everyone up who has cancer, the next generation of doctors going through exams that won't now pop out the other end. People will still die from non corona related illnesses.

Can't just lock everyone down without consequences that are just as bad. Government is following the least worst option, not an option that can cope, not an option that can't cope cope, it's all about the least worst option.

We have generations of people in this country who believe that man controls everything, climate change and all that nonsense. Well here is a wake up call, in nature man is nothing in the scheme of things, we are the fly on the windshield of the HGV travelling at 60 mph.
 
Children catch the coronavirus at almost the same rate as adults (see link below) - but just don't show the symptons as much. So schools will become one large petri dish. Children infecting each other, then all the parents, and the teachers. Two weeks of this will, by far, outweigh any short term benefit.

https://www.livescience.com/can-kids-get-coronavirus.html

They've asked over 70s to isolate from the weekend. So if from that point onwards the schools remain open then the kids will then mainly be passing the virus on to their parents. This spreads it mainly amongst the 2 age groups that can fight it best.

The government need the majority of the people who are unlikely to die from it to catch it and recover anyway so perhaps they see the above as the best way to do it?

There's a wonderful article on assumed spread and recovery here - it shows how the managed spread and social distancing policy may be very sensible in the long run. Fingers crossed it goes well!

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2020/world/corona-simulator/?itid=hp_hp-banner-low_virus-simulator520pm:homepage/story-ans
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

The Rule #1

Do not insult any other member. Be polite and do business. Thank you!

Premium Members

Latest Comments

New Threads

Domain Forum Friends

Our Mods' Businesses

*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators
General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
      There are no messages in the current room.
      Top Bottom