I have yet to read a convincing case for these reaching last years high's except for wishful thinking.
Pundits can't even agree on what makes the price rise.
Where there is no regulation you are batting in the dark.
If they go back to 400 the few who bought at 300 will have win win stories, the ones who bought at 400 will be glad to be back to evens and start to get out, but it already has to rise 33% to get back to 400 so the 300 investors will sell also and the price will fall back down, so lower ceilings and lower floors. It's totally reliant on new entrants.
The hype of large companies entering the fray should not necessarily be read as an endorsement of value. Large companies have money to burn and often have ulterior motives for their actions.
Pundits can't even agree on what makes the price rise.
Where there is no regulation you are batting in the dark.
If they go back to 400 the few who bought at 300 will have win win stories, the ones who bought at 400 will be glad to be back to evens and start to get out, but it already has to rise 33% to get back to 400 so the 300 investors will sell also and the price will fall back down, so lower ceilings and lower floors. It's totally reliant on new entrants.
The hype of large companies entering the fray should not necessarily be read as an endorsement of value. Large companies have money to burn and often have ulterior motives for their actions.