- Joined
- Jul 30, 2008
- Posts
- 635
- Reaction score
- 8
Yet when I asked for a similar assessment of visitunitedkingdom.co.uk , I was shot down by hordes of nit-picking regular contributors to this forum and the thread was curtailed !!
If Greece is GOOD..........how come United Kingdom is BAD??? Most contributors LIVE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM.......not Greece!!
Answers on a postcard , please !! Euros or Sterling stamps !!
Apologies to Steve for going off topic. But in answer to your question RedKite, as you know visitcountryname domains do have value to end users, normally to official tourist boards who have deep pockets.
However, there is a flaw in applying this to visitunitedkingdom.co.uk. A .co.uk is really only useful if the end users of the website are in the UK. Hence the body in California buying visitcalifornia.co.uk from you, to market California to UK residents. Visitgreece.co.uk would be used to market Greece to UK residents.
If you are marketing the UK, Great Britain, whatever you want to call it to overseas residents, you need a cctld from the country where the visitors are coming from, or a .com. Hence visitbritain.com - where you select the country you are from and are redirected to the cctld, for example visitbritain.fr if you are from France.
Visitunitedkingdom.co.uk would be useful to marketing the UK to UK residents who wanted to "visit" the UK. Hence the problem. a UK resident might want to visit cornwall (or Sheffield!), but not the UK.
I'm not saying it has no value, but much much less than your other non-hyphenated visitcountryname domains.
Hopefully you will take this in the spirit it is intended, applying the logic you requested to a domain valuation, and will not just EMPHASISE where I am obviously deluded.
Apologies to Steve again, nice domain to be developed I would say.